It is a frustrating fact that very few old sidesaddle safety stirrups will fit a modern boot.
So I was very pleased to find TWO large Cope safety stirrups in the bottom of a case of tack

Cope Safety stirrups

Just a minute – two – as in a pair….
Sure enough, on the underside of the tread one is marked “Nearside” and the other “Offside”

Stamp on stirrup tread

Offside stirrup

Stamp on stirrup

Nearside stirrup

Alice Hayes described the opening mechanism of these stirrups better than I can (see a previous blog here), and pointed out that they can only work in one direction – hence the curved part of the tread is stamped “TOE”

Stamp on safety stirrup

'Toe' and 'Heel' stamped on stirrup

If the rider falls and their foot remains caught in the stirrup the inner arch of the stirrup rotates backwards and releases the outer edge of the tread.

Safety stirrups

Stirrup mechanisms open

They are also stamped “B.Cope’s Patent No. 8940″, “Best Reliagine” (probably a tradename for a nickel alloy) and “45297″. Benjamin Cope of Bloxwich patented this stirrup design in 1895 , one can read the full patent description courtesy of Google here

On reflection it seems that these stirrups were intended for someone riding astride, and given their large size (their interior width is 4 inches or 10.2cm) probably a man.

However wouldn’t they be perfect for an ambidextrous sidesaddle rider ?

Divider

Compass on a whip handle
Several years ago I wrote about a whip with a compass in the handle : Read more here

So, I was pleased to find this Champion & Wilton saddle flask with a space in its lid for a compass :

Champion & Wilton saddle flask

Champion & Wilton flask

Champion & Wilton were a prestigious company of saddlers, famous for sidesaddles, but I wonder if this flask was a military officer’s private purchase.
There are more details at http://www.sportingcollection.com/attire/flasks/flask018/flask018.html
Divider

If you find yourself in Trafalgar Square I would recommend visiting the crypt of St.Martin-in-the-fields for several reasons :
It is a remarkable brick built vaulted structure
They have an excellent cafe
And high up on one of the pillars is this stone, in which is carved the name of Benjamin Latchford, Churchwarden

Inscription in the crypt of St Martins

Could this be the same Benjamin Latchford who published “The Loriner : Opinions and Observations on bridle-bits and the suitable bitting of horses, with illustrations” in 1871 ? The short answer is yes.

Latchford's book The Loriner

The Loriner gives Latchford’s address as 11, Upper St. Martins Lane. It was evidently a popular book and ran to several editions, mine dates from 1883. In fact one can still buy re-prints today. The illustrations are excellent & Latchford had some interesting ideas for his time including the now famous line “I frequently tell my friends that out of every twenty bits I make, nineteen are for men’s heads and not more than one really for the horse’s head”, although he also wrote “the horse’s mouth and temper may be compared to a lock, so made that only one key will fit it…” The Loriner also includes Don Juan Segundo’s treatise “A New Method of Bitting Horses”.

Thinking about Latchford’s links with St Martins Lane reminded me of one of my bits that has confused me for a while. It is a check snaffle stamped “Latchford” & “Picadilly”
A steel check bit or snaffle

A little internet research revealed several Latchfords who were bit and spurmakers :

1791 The Universal British Directory lists a John Latchford, Bridle Bit Maker at 8, Little St.Martins Lane

1819 The London Post Office Directory lists Edward Latchford at 12, Little St.Martins Lane and John Latchford at 36 Piccadilly

1829 John Latchford, a bit and spur maker of Piccadilly appears in the records of the Old Bailey (Read the proceedings here). He had been robbed, but the thief was found not guilty, perhaps my favourite line explains this : “Prisoner. He was quite tipsy – he was there before me. Witness. I was not tipsy – he was there when I went down stairs; I do not know whether he was tipsy – I was not; I had not drank more than six glasses of wine.”

1833 John Latchford’s luck wasn’t improving – he appears in the Bankrupt Directory on August 6

1840 Benjamin Latchford was a witness in a court case – he stated his occupation as working for his uncle (presumably Edward) at St Martins Lane

1843 The Post Office Directory records Edward Latchford at 12 Little St Martins Lane and John Latchford still at 36, Piccadilly

1871 Benjamin Latchford published “The Loriner” with Don Juan de Segundo

1891 The Saddlery & Harness Journal reported that the Queen’s bit maker Mr Chavasse of Walsall, the principal of Messrs Latchford & Co of Upper St, Martins Lane, WC London was made an honorary freeman of the Loriners Company

Spurs by Latchford

Spurs by Latchford

spur by Latchford

Buxton by Latchford

Buxton by Latchford

Page from the Loriner

Page from the Loriner

And Benjamin Latchford’s link with graves ? He and Mr Petter, his fellow churchwarden were named in a court case concerning burials in a piece of land that the church was selling. It was thought that only a few burials had taken place there & permission was given to move those. The vicar of St Pancras brought the case when he believed that four or five hundred bodies had been disinterred. The whole case is reported in “The Jurist”

Divider

This fascinating advert appears in the Bath Directory of 1846 :

Advert for Victorian Riding School

It reads :

CARTER’S Riding School, Livery & Commission Stables,
Top of Russell Street, Bath

Ladies & Gentlemen taught the Polite Art of Riding by an Experienced Master

Horses & Carriages of every description let for hire

Horses Broke & Trained for every purpose

Job and Post Master

Capital Boxes for Hunters

Families Supplied with Hay & Corn – at the Market Price”

And (thanks to Andrew Swift’s “On Foot in Bath” ) I found its original entrance.

Russell Street old site of Riding School

To give some idea of what the school may have looked like this is an image of the slightly later Hollandsche Manege in Amsterdam

Hollandsche Manege in Amsterdam

Intriguingly it was also used as a bicycle riding school at one point. Early bicycles or velocipedes were difficult to learn to ride, in a publication of 1869 the author “Velox” wrote :
“the velocipedes are positively to be found in our streets by hundreds, and our gymnasiums and riding-schools are thronged by anxious learners and expectant possessors of the new iron horse and carriage combined. “
There is also an excellent blog about the earlier “Dandy Horse” here

I thought I had found another image when I read about a “Portrait of Lizard, the pillar horse, in Capt. Carter’s riding-school” by William Sawrey Gilpin RA, but it dates from 1763, so not the same riding school. Good name for a horse though. One of the dictionary definitions of pillar is “The centre of the volta, ring, or manege ground, around which a horse turns”, or it could refer to the posts between which the horse stands in some forms of classical dressage training.

There were other riding schools in Bath. In “The Strangers’ Assistant & Guide to Bath” of 1773 R. Cruttwell wrote

“In rainy weather thofe who chufe to take exercife or learn to ride, may do it very conveniently in a large, commodious Riding-fchool, kept by Mr. Scrace, in Montpelier Row. The days for Gentlemen are Mondays, Wednefdays, and Fridays; and for Ladies, Tuefdays, Thurfdays, and Saturdays. The terms for thofe that learn to ride and ride the managed horfes, are three guineas per month or 5s. 3d. a leffon. Gentlemen whofe horfes are kept at the Riding-houfe, are allowed to ride them in the fchool gratis.” (sorry, I can’t resist a long S)

Riding Scool Montpelier Row BathThe riding school in Montpelier, Bath from Bath In Time

In the 1841 Bath Directory John Stevenson is listed as the proprietor

Old Riding School in BathThe riding school in 1890 from Bath In Time

There was a neighbouring pub on Julian Road called “The Manege Horse” – it was sometimes known as “The Managed Horse”. The riding school was demolished in 1973.

Divider

A maritime exhibition in a museum of archaeology might not be the most obvious place to find a silver stirrup.
However this was part of the exhibition of maritime archaeology at Lisbon’s Archaeological Museum

Silver stirrup with shell decoration

18th Century silver stirrup from shipwreck

It is catalogued as a silver stirrup dating from the 18th century, measuring 14cm x 12.5cm x 9.7cm and weighing 667grams.

It was the first object which identified the archaeological site of the wreck of the San Pedro de Alcantara.

Silver stirrup from shipwreck

18th century silver stirrup

The stirrup is heavily decorated. There is a suspension loop, the sides of the arch have masks at their top ends these have beards which flow down the flared sides of the arch. The front of the stirrup is protected by two shells making it a “cage stirrup” ( or in portuguese “de janela” or window stirrup ).
It was made in Peru, then a Spanish possession. Shells were frequently used in the baroque style of decoration and the fashion for the baroque lasted around a century longer in Peru than in Spain.
However, scallop shells also frequently appeared on harness decorations – a reference to the pilgrimage to Santiago de Compostela. There were one hundred licensed scallop shell sellers around the cathedral of Santiago in 1200AD, it may be that the shell refers back to an earlier pre-Christian religious ritual around the journey of the dead, read more here

It seems rather ironic that a stirrup with a maritime theme should end up in a famous shipwreck.

Pillemont painting of the wreck of the San Pedro de Alcantara
The wreck of the San Pedro de Alcantara by Jean-Baptiste Pillement

The San Pedro de Alacantara was a ship of the line of the Royal Spanish Navy. It was built in Cuba and launched in 1771. The ship was a prototype and there were problems with its design.
It was active in the Pacific Ocean during the American Revolutionary war, when Spain also declared war against Britain in 1779.
In 1783 it set sail for Cadiz in Spain from the port of Callao, very heavily laden with gold, copper, ancient pottery and prisoners from the Tupac Amaru Inca rebellion. It seems that the ship may have been overloaded with heavy cargo , partly because of the end of the American War of Indepence, partly because the British had finally lifted the blockades on South American ports and partly because of the Inca rebellion. It had to stop en route to Spain for repairs and eventually was wrecked at 10.30pm on February 2nd 1786 at Peniche, north of Lisbon.
One hundred and fifty two people died in the wreck including seventeen Tupac Amaru rebellion prisoners who were still manacled at the time, fourteen officers, five women and one hundred and twenty eight crew members. Shortly after the wreck many divers arrived from all over Europe to salvage valuables, they retrieved most of the guns and a large quantity of gold and copper ….

but not this one piece of silver, which stayed submerged for another two hundred or so years

Divider

Antique beagling whip

 

 

This little beagling whip came from an online auction.
It had looked great in its photo.
And indeed it has an antler handle well carved as a hound’s head ( complete with the surprised expression that the dogs on these whip handles always seem to sport ).
It has a lovely collar decorated with a scene of a hound chasing a fox by a gate.
The short shaft or stock is made of golden malacca cane with a good patina. The rawhide open keeper needs re-binding but is otherwise fine.
The only problem was with the hound’s eyes – or more accurately, eye.
It had lost one of its original glass eyes, leaving an empty right socket that looked downright sinister.

Left eye of whip handle

The left eye is present and correct

Whip handle missing hound's eye

Just a socket where the right eye should be

It looks like something out of a horror film – so – what to do ?

This was my first thought – not exactly practical, but it amused me for five minutes :

Beagling whip with eye patch

Actually, I think he looks quite rakish.

But obviously that wasn’t the answer. On careful inspection of his remaining eye it looked to be made of glass. So I hit the internet.
I now know that there are many different sort of glass eyes out there – eyes for actual people, eyes for taxidermists, eyes for toys, eyes for the macabre end of the interior decorating spectrum.
After a LOT of searching I found some suppliers of 3mm diameter German handblown glass eyes.

Whip with glass eyes

And they were too small….
Back to the internet, different company, 4mm diameter eyes.
I’m spending so much time on this whip I almost feel like I should be giving it a name.

Whip with glass eyes

A selection of 4mm eyes

The eyes are handmade and vary fractionally in size. So I chose the one that most closely fits the socket.

Beagling whip with two eyes

The iris is a bit paler and a bit smaller than the original eye, but I think it’s the closest that I’m going to get. I’m certainly not going to try replacing the original eye. I still need to find some sort of cement to hold it in place

And then all I have to do is get the keeper re-bound

Divider

This rather splendid portrait is part of the World War I exhibition at Bath’s Fashion Museum

 Captain Flora Sandes holding a riding whip

My attention was caught by the horse leg handled whip (and the boots, if I’m honest). However, the short biography of the sitter was even more fascinating. (the following owes a certain amount to Wikipedia)

She was Flora Sandes (22 January 1876 – 24 November 1956) was the only British woman officially to serve as a soldier in World War I.

She was the daughter of a Suffolk clergyman. As a child she was educated by governesses, she enjoyed riding and shooting and said that she wished she had been born a boy. As a young woman she learned to drive, and drove an old French racing car.

Sandes trained with the First Aid Nursing Yeomanry Corps, founded in 1907, as an all-women mounted paramilitary organisation, learning first aid, horsemanship, signalling and drill. She left the F.A.N.Y. in 1910 joining another renegade FANY, Mabel St Clair Stobart, in the formation of the Women’s Sick & Wounded Convoy. The Convoy saw service in Serbia and Bulgaria in 1912 during the 1st Balkans War. At the outbreak of the First World War in 1914 she volunteered to become a nurse, but was rejected due to a lack of qualifications.

Sandes nonetheless joined a St. John Ambulance unit raised by American nurse Mabel Grouitch, and on 12 August 1914 left England for Serbia with a group of 36 women to try and aid the humanitarian crises there. They arrived at the town of Kragujevac which was the base for the Serbian forces fighting against the Austro-Hungarian offensive. Sandes joined the Serbian Red Cross and worked in an ambulance for the Second Infantry Regiment of the Serbian Army. During the retreat into Albania, Sandes was separated from her unit and, for her own safety, enrolled as a soldier with a Serbian regiment. Following the Balkan tradition of “sworn virgins”, it was not unknown for women to serve in the Serbian army, but Sandes was the only British woman to do so. She quickly advanced to the rank of Corporal. In 1916, during the Serbian advance on Bitola (Monastir), Sandes was seriously wounded by a grenade in hand to hand combat. She subsequently received the highest decoration of the Serbian Military, the Order of the Karađorđe’s Star. At the same time, she was promoted to the rank of Sergeant Major. Also in 1916, Sandes published her autobiography, An English Woman-Sergeant in the Serbian Army. She spent the rest of the war working in a hospital. At the end of the war she was promoted to the rank of Captain.

She married a Serbian White Army officer, after his death she returned to Suffolk.

Divider

 

Someone contacted me last week looking for old eggbutt bits to use as curtain tie-backs (or more accurately drape tie-backs, they were in the USA) This sounded like an interesting idea & got me looking around the web for equestrian-themed interior design – after all, it works for Hermes & Ralph Lauren…

 

 

 

This hessian / burlap drape or blind idea came from Pinterest, but I can’t find the original source to acknowledge

There’s quite a lot of it about – done well it can look fantastic & be rather witty, but I suspect it would be easy to have too much of a good thing

This idea for towel holders comes from the Arizona- based interior design company Lizard Flats

A simple mullen mouth snaffle used as a towel ring found on Etsy

British Military bit    Household Cavalry bit

An ex-Household Cavalry man once told me that the pieces of equipment most often kept by men leaving the cavalry were the “Peninsula” troopers’ bits & that they were used as loo roll holders. At the time I couldn’t quite see how this would work, but thanks to the internet all has become clear.


This one appeared on Etsy


Another example from Pinterest, wouldn’t you worry about splinters ?

There are whole blogs devoted to the subject :

There are instructions for making this stirrup towel holder at Equinestylist.com

And while we’re on the subject of stirrups…
Hermes clock and barometer in stirrups
A desktop clock and barometer in Cadre Noir stirrups by Hermes

Iberian box stirrups converted into lamps
Iberian box stirrups converted into lamps at Shades of Light

And you’ve probably heard about an “armchair ride” – how’s this ?
Leather saddle armchair

More details at Restoration Hardware , and here’s another view :

Leather saddle armchair

There’s an awful lot of horse related decoration out there, without even starting on hunting-themed ceramics or the whole area of prints & paintings.

(Sorry, due to huge amounts of spam I’ve closed comments here, but please feel free to contact me by email or comment on Facebook)

Divider

Copes safety stirrup in action

This image attracted me to the Project Gutenberg Ebook of Alice M. Hayes’ “The Horsewoman, A Practical Guide to Sidesaddle Riding” (The whole text can be read here )

The front page of the book tells us that it is the 2nd edition, published in 1903, it was edited by Capt M. HORACE HAYES, F.R.C.V.S. (Late Captain “The Buffs”, Author of “Points of the Horse,” “Veterinary Notes for Horse-Owners,” “Riding and Hunting,” etc.) and that Mrs Hayes was also the author of the intriguingly titled “My Leper Friends”.

The chapter starts:

SAFETY STIRRUPS,
both for men and ladies, have been in existence for hundreds of years.

slipper stirrups
Fig 18 & Fig 19 Capped and Slipper stirrups

Apparently the first variety of this contrivance was the capped stirrup-iron, either simple (Fig. 18) or in the form of a slipper (Fig. 19), which was provided with an arrangement on its sole that prevented the toe of the slipper from yielding to downward pressure, but allowed it to revolve upwards, and thus to facilitate the release of the foot, in the event of a fall. The simple capped stirrup was used by ancient Spanish Cavaliers, and is still employed by many of their descendants in America.”

(The author does not show us these stirrups but I assume she means the Iberian “box” stirrup :

Portuguese Box stirrup
Estribo de caixa – more details here

or Latin American stirrups, sometimes called “Conquistador stirrups”

Brass conquistador pattern stirrups
“Conquistador” pattern stirrups – more details here

or tapaderos :

Monkey nosed tapaderos
Monkey nosed tapaderos – more details here

Back to Mrs Hayes:

“In apparent oblivion of these facts, the Christie stirrup (Fig. 20), made on the same principle, was patented about four years ago.
Christie stirrup
Fig 20 Christie stirrup

Besides its undue weight (1¼ lb. as compared to the ½ lb. of the slipper stirrup), it has the further disadvantage of allowing the possibility of the toe being caught between its bars (Fig. 21).

foot caught in stirrup
Fig 21. A foot caught in a Christies’ stirrup

Latchford safety stirrup
Fig 22. Latchford safety stirrup

Want of neatness appears to have been the only cause of the abandonment of the capped stirrup, which is certainly safer than any of its successors, the first English one of which appears to have been the Latchford safety stirrup (Fig. 22). It consists of two irons; the small one, which is placed within the large one, being made to come out the moment the foot gets dragged in it, in which case it parts company with its fellow, and is then liable to get lost.

Latchford safety stirrup
Parts of Latchford Safety Stirrup – see more about this stirrup here

Scott Safety stirrup
Fig 23. Scott safety stirrup – see an example here

The Scott safety stirrup (Figs. 23 and 24) has not this fault, for its inner iron always retains its connection with the outer one, and can be replaced without delay, if the lady after her tumble desires to remount.

Scott safety stirrup showing release mechanism
Fig 24. Scott safety stirrup open

The Latchford, Scott ordinary, and Cope safety stirrup (Figs. 25 and 26) open only one way, so that the foot, when correctly placed in any of them, may not be liable, as in the event of a fall, to be forced through the outer iron, in which case the lady would almost to a certainty get hung up if her saddle was not provided with a safety bar. In these stirrups, the side of the “tread,” which ought to be to the rear, is generally indicated by the fact of its being straight, while the other side is curved (Fig. 24). This is done in the Scott stirrup, by the word “heel” being stamped on the rear part.

Copes safety stirrup
Fig 25. Cope Safety Stirrup – see another example
here

Copes safety stirrup in action
Cope Safety Stirrup releasing the rider’s foot

The chief faults of so-called safety stirrups are as follows:—

  1. They may catch on the foot, on account of getting crushed by coming in violent contact with a tree, wall or other hard object, or by the horse falling on his near side. When I was living in India, I had a Scott safety stirrup jammed on my foot in this manner, by a horse which I was riding, making a sudden shy and dashing against a wall. The iron was so firmly fixed to my foot by this accident, that it could not be taken off until, after much pain and trouble, my foot was freed from both boot and stirrup. Had I been unseated, I would probably have been killed, because my saddle had not a safety bar.

     

  2. Those which open only when the foot is put into them in one way, are apt to cause a fatal accident if put in the wrong way, which may easily happen from carelessness or ignorance. The methods (straight edge of “tread,” or word “heel”) used with these stirrups, to indicate the proper side on which to put the foot into the iron, may convey no meaning to persons who are not well acquainted with the details of side-saddle gear, and in moments of hurry and excitement may be easily overlooked.

     

  3. Any ordinary safety stirrup which is used without a safety bar may cause a lady to get “hung up,” if she is thrown to the off side and her heel gets jammed against the saddle in the manner shown in Fig. 28.

     

  4. A fall to the offside
    Fig 28. A fall to the offside

  5. If the outer iron is small in comparison to the size of the foot, the rider may easily get dragged.

     

  6. If the outer iron of a Scott’s reversible safety stirrup is large in comparison to the size of the foot (as in the case of a young girl), the rider may get dragged in the event of a fall, by the foot going through the stirrup. Accidents caused by a foot going through a stirrup have often occurred to men from falls when hunting and steeplechasing.

     

Some ladies think it “smart” to ride with a man’s ordinary stirrup iron, or (madder still) with a small racing stirrup, attached to a leather which does not come out. I once saw a lady who adopted this senseless plan fall and get dragged. By an extraordinary piece of good luck she was saved from a horrible death by her boot coming off.

 

All that can be said in favour of safety stirrups, is that they are less liable to cause accidents than ordinary stirrups. The fact remains, that the danger of being dragged by the stirrup can be entirely obviated only by the use of an efficient safety bar.”


 

And so ends the chapter.

Alice M. Hayes sounds like a remarkable woman, and I really want to believe that she posed for those photographs of falls herself…

Divider

Book about antique hitching posts

However specialised your field of collecting, someone somewhere in the world probably shares your passion . I was delighted to find this book : “Horsing Around – 19th Century Cast Iron Hitching Posts”, it’s a catalogue of an exhibition of (surprise, surprise) hitching posts from the collection of Phil & Bunny Savino at the Albany Institute of History & Art in 2008. It focuses on American hitching posts, which were commonly freestanding cast iron posts; in Europe tethering rings or finials were more often attached to pre-existing walls, posts or pillars. The hitching posts were decorative as well as functional, common designs were horse heads, patriotic emblems such as the flag or an eagle, dogs, snakes, people and geometric or architectural shapes. Their makers are rarely identified and they fall into the category of “Folk Art”

Victorian horse head tethering posts
French Horse butchers sign
A French Horse Butcher’s Sign

I had bought the book in the hope of identifying the pair of horse heads shown above, I found one example in it that was similar but not identical . These are probably English and would have been placed on top of pillars or posts in a yard. The vendor described them as “19th Century cast iron horse heads possibly from a horse butcher’s shop”. I’m sure that’s wrong, I sold a French Boucherie Chevaline zinc horse head model a few years ago – it was much lighter in weight so that it could be hung on a wall & didn’t have bit rings (I suspect that thinking about one’s favourite riding horse before tucking into a steak doesn’t help the appetite )

Victorian horse head tethering posts

Christies sold a very similar white painted pair in 1999. They described them as “A pair of English white-painted cast-iron horse head tethering-post finials Circa 1870. Each with two rings in its mouth, on a circular base 10 in. (26 cm.) high”. They can be seen here

Victorian horse head tethering posts

The horse heads are made of cast iron, each was originally cast in two halves – a seam is just visible along the back of each mane. There are defects around their bases, presumably from when they were removed from their posts or pillars. The quality of the casting is very good and the details of the manes, eyes and even facial blood vessels are clear. The bit rings are in good order & still move freely. They have been painted gloss black, there are a few very small chips in the paint. They stand 10½ inches (26cm) high, and they are very heavy

Victorian horse head tethering posts

Divider